|
.
Activities: ICM /
IPM
Integrated Pest Management
Organizations involved:
Agrocel
and EIL
Aim:
|
● |
On-farm
testing of different bio-pesticides in management of pod
borer complex in pulses. |
|
● |
To promote IPM
practices in major pulses – pigeon pea and chickpea. |
|
● |
Reduce cost of cultivation and improve quantitative as
well as qualitative yield of the crop and bring greater
benefits to farmers. |
Brief Description:
|
|
|
|
● |
In 1997/98, the outbreak of pod borers (Helicoverpa and
Spodoptera) resulted in complete failure of major pulses
all over India. Conventional chemical pest control
measures failed to adequately control these pests that
resulting in severe yield losses. |
|
● |
Unsafe use of pesticides by the farmers also resulted in
increased pesticide poisoning cases during that period.
Subsequently, the pesticide industry and pesticide dealers
were highly criticized for the supply of spurious
pesticides and for not promoting ethical business
practices. |
|
● |
Excel responded positively and timely to this grave
situation. We established several biopesticides-based IPM
trials with farmers in several hot-spot areas of the
Marathwada region. |
|
● |
Our IPM schedule and foliar use of growth promoters proved
effective in reviving the failed crop with reasonable
yields. |
|
● |
At the end of the season, a 2-day “Excel Harvest Festival”
was celebrated where farmers, scientists and Government
officials shared their views and experiences about this
project. |
|
● |
Subsequently, the benefit of our IPM package was
demonstrated on large scale in other states. |
Key Result Areas identified for the
project:
|
● |
Development of bio-pesticide based IPM schedule. |
|
● |
Role of Aminocel – a growth promoter in pulses. |
|
● |
Training of farmers and dealers. |
|
● |
Proper spraying techniques and safe use of pesticides. |
|
● |
Management strategies for the revival of failed crop. |
|
● |
Higher yields and profits. |
Geographical Area of Implementation:
|
● |
Kutch and Surendar Nagar in
Gujarat |
|
● |
Kaithal in Haryana. |
Period of Implementation:
|
Year of Commencement: |
1997/98 |
Year of Completion: |
1998/99 |
Current Status: Biopesticide-based
IPM practices and use of growth promoters have become popular
with pulse farmers.
Key Persons:
●
Hasmukh Patel, Agrocel
●
M. V. Potdar and S. Banerji, Excel Industries Ltd.
●
Dilip Maiti, Ramrishna Mission - Calcutta
●
Excel Dealers and Marketing staff
Major mile stones:
|
● |
Establishment
and monitoring of on-farm trials. |
|
● |
Data
collection and analysis. |
|
● |
IPM training
to farmers and dealers. |
|
● |
Biopesticide
awareness among farmers, dealers and marketing staff. |
|
● |
Presentation
of the project results at various forums. |
Major Achievements:
|
● |
Development of
biopesticide-based IPM schedule for pigeonpea and
chickpea. |
|
● |
Our technology
proved effective in reviving the failed crops. |
|
● |
Celebration of
the Excel Harvest Festival. |
|
● |
Farmer
benefited with higher yields and profits. |
|
● |
Biopesticide
and growth promoter as new business opportunity for Excel. |
Major Setbacks:
|
● |
Availability
of quality biopesticides. |
|
● |
Lack of
awareness among farmers about IPM and biopesticides. |
|
● |
Terminal
drought during the season. |
Learning:
|
● |
On-farm
constraints to crop production. |
|
● |
Farmer crop
production practices. |
|
● |
Management of
on-farm trials. |
|
● |
Working with
farmers and dealers. |
|
● |
Role of
bio-pesticides and growth promoters in pulses. |
Note:
A similar project was implemented for Cotton with the aim of
establishing the benefits of ICM practices over conventional
crop management (CCM) practices and to promote ICM concept for
sustainable cotton production. Moreover, a third project was
introduced as Integrated Crop Management (ICM) in Chilies.
Go to:
Top /
ICM Page /
Case Study of a Farmer
. |